Testimonials

“The SRA is indeed an attractive alternative, and the data produced are similar within the levels of uncertainty defined by Espitalie for source rock potential measurements. The point is that when you get the same data, why not use an instrument that actually analyses your samples in a reliable and reproducible way (it is incredibly stable!!)”

a customer in Denmark

“The SRA has worked very well. It did all the samples Sunday evening and it has been running continuously without a problem. I have just set up a new sequence and checked the gases and all is well. I have embarked on the data compiling and I can assure you that it is very exciting.”

a customer in Kenya

“The SRA has worked very well. It did all the samples Sunday evening and it has been running continuously without a problem. I have just set up a new sequence and checked the gases and all is well. I have embarked on the data compiling and I can assure you that it is very exciting.”

a customer in Kenya

“Before the SRA we spent as much as $50,000 - $70,000 USD per year in consumables and yet at times the instrument still did not work. The SRA was very reliable in that the daily precision never exceeded ± 5% and it never required repairs besides routine maintenance.”

a customer in the Middle East

“About 70% of our source rock samples are contaminated with diesel or oil-base drilling mud additives. So to know good source rock from contaminated source rock we depended on classic ways like extraction, GC, and sometime GC/MS analyses that consume a lot of time. We now use TEPI-GC. Honestly, without TEPI we couldn’t screen the good from bad samples which before was a very pain for our projects.

TEPI-GC is very easy to operate. I analysis about 8-12 samples everyday. Before, these analyses took about 2-3 weeks of work to determine if we were on the right track or not.”

a customer from Dhahran